Hi everyone,
I think that the constructivist theory is probably one I draw on a great deal in my teaching practices. It might be related to my preferred learning styles—NF and NT. I love creative activities and activities where I can solve problems. I find that when I can dive in and explore a topic, and play with it—testing ideas, verifying them—I’m making meaningful connections—and I remember what I’ve learned. I see the constructivist theory as providing a chance for more authentic, real world contexts for activities. If one can see a real world application, it is typically more meaningful, even for very abstract concepts.
When I was learning trigonometry, there was little opportunity to do more than memorize the formulas. I recall having difficulty although I love math---because I didn’t see a real world connection for the concepts—and so it was hard for me to make sense of what I was learning. I wish there had been an opportunity to apply these concepts in some way that made sense to me.
I find that typically projects are very helpful learning experiences. For one, they work well in collaborative contexts—and each learning style can usually find a task that he/she is attracted to. Second, there is an opportunity to learn to problem solve as a group—a very valuable skill. Students have models of other learning styles and approaches in their peers—they have a chance to see what works for other people—and to expand their own strategies. Finally, there is a finished product—something a student can take away and take pride in.
Looking forward to others’ thoughts.